Author

Roditeleva Ya.N.

Title of article

PRIVILEGES IN THE SYSTEM OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IMMUNITIES

Section

Section 11. The problems of legal science and law enforcement practice: young researchers’ view

Issue, year

2 (44) 2018

Abstract

The article deals with the issues related to the essence of such criminal procedure institution as the institution of immunities, which extends to a separate category of persons specified in chapter 52 of the criminal Procedure code of the Russian Federation. The patterns of both political and social nature that determine the granting of immunities to certain categories of persons are analyzed. determining the place of privileges in the system of criminal procedure immunities of the legal status
of persons having special official powers and holding a special position in the state is of indisputable importance for criminal procedure law. The essence of immunities is determined by the method of
comparative analysis. This essence consists in the fact that the state expresses its will through the immunities provided by laws, while the advantages, that are not legally fixed, are provided to different
citizens and in various fields of activity by social norms in the form of benefits and privileges as a social category. having examined and studied the manifestation of immunity through the category of
“privileges”, the author argues that the main purpose of immunities, including the criminal procedure, is to create a legal environment in which the entities provided by legislation will be able to carry out state
functions through their authorities freely.

Keywords

criminal proceedings; criminal procedure immunity; privilege.

References

1. Kazakov A.A. Disbalans v pravovom regulirovanii protsessualnykh immunitetov v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Imbalance in the legal regulation of procedural immunities in the sphere of criminal proceedings].Lex Russica – Lex Russica, 2016, no 4, pp. 115-123.

2. Zhulev V.I. O neobkhodimosti srochnykh mer, napravlennykh na ustranenie probelov i kolliziy v svyazi
s vvedeniem v deystvie UPK RF [On the need for urgent measures aimed at eliminating gaps and collisions in
connection with the introduction of the Code of Criminal Procedure]. Novyy ugolovno-protsessualnyy zakon: teoriya i praktika primeneniya [New criminal procedure law: theory and practice of application]. Moscow, 2003. Рр. 69-73.

3. Kasta neprikasaemykh [Caste untouchables]. Available at: https://versia.ru/deputatov-vsex-urovnej-xotyatogradit-ot-ugolovnogo-presledovaniya (Accessed October 30, 2017).

4. Krasil`nikov A.V. Ugolovno-protsessualnye privilegii otdelnykh kategoriy lits. Avtoref. Kand. Diss. [Criminal
procedural privileges of certain categories of persons. Autoabstract Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2006, 22 p.

5. Slovar` meditsinskikh terminov [Dictionary of Medical Terms]. Available at: http://lib.ru/NTL/MED/slowar_a-k.txt (Accessed October 30, 2017).

6. Isaenkov A.I. Immunitety v grazhdanskom protsessualnom prave Rossii. Kand. Diss. [Immunities in the civil
procedural law of Russia. Cand. Diss.]. Saratov, 2016, 195 p.
7. Kibal`nik A.G. Immunitety v ugolovnom prave [Immunities in criminal law]. Stavropol, Stavropolservisshkola
Publ., 1999. 176 p.

8. Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovyy slovar` russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy
[Dictionary of the Russian language: 80 000 words and phraseological expressions]. Moscow, Azbukovnik Publ.,
1999. 944 p.

9. Slovar` russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of the Russian language. In 4 volumes. Volume 1]. Moscow, Russkiy
Yazik Publ., 1999. 736 p.

10. Belkin R.S. Kriminalisticheskaya entsiklopediya [Forensic encyclopedia]. Moscow, Megatron XXI Publ.,
2000. 334 p.

11. Sovremennyy tolkovyy slovar` russkogo yazyka [The modern explanatory dictionary of the Russian
language]. St. Petersburg, Norint Publ., 2003. 960 p.

12. Slovar` inostrannykh slov [Dictionary of foreign words]. Moscow, Russkiy Yazik Publ., 1989, 624 p.

13. Bolshoy tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka [Great Dictionary of Russian language]. St. Petersburg, Norint Publ., 2000. 1536 p.

14. Sidorova N.V., Salamatova Ye.I. Problemy sluzhebnogo (dolzhnostnogo) immuniteta v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [Problems of official (official) immunity in the Russian criminal trial]. Molodoy uchenyy – Young Scientist, 2014, no. 2, pp. 600-601.
15. Sumenkov S.Yu. Privilegii i immunitety kak obshchepravovye kategorii. Avtoref. Kand. Diss. [Privileges and
immunities as general legal categories. Autoabstract Cand. Diss.]. Saratov, 2002. 26 p.

16. Usilit` ikh neprikosnovennost predlagayut deputaty Gosdumy iz «Yedinoy Rossii» [To strengthen their
immunity, State Duma deputies from “United Russia” are offered]. Novosti mira 24 [World news 24]. Available at:
https://novostimira24.ru/ysilit-ih-neprikosnovennost-predlagaut-depytaty-gosdymy-iz-edinoi-rossii/ (Accessed October 30, 2017).

17. Kirpichnikov A.I. Rossiyskaya korruptsiya [Russian corruption]. St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press Publ., 2004, 439 p.
18. Dyuryagin I.Ya. Grazhdanin i zakon [Citizen and Law]. Moscow, 1989. 278 p.

19. Mal`ko A.V., Sumenkov S.Yu. Pravovoy immunitet: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty [Legal immunity:
theoretical and practical aspects]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2002, no. 2, рр. 17-26.

20. Bondar` N.S., Kapranova Yu.V. Konstitutsionnoe izmerenie ravnopraviya grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Constitutional dimension of the equality of citizens of the Russian Federation]. Rostov-on-Don, Publishing house of the Rostov University, 2002. 190 р.

21. Kozyuk M.N. Pravovoe ravenstvo v mekhanizme pravovogo regulirovaniya [Legal equality in the
mechanism of legal regulation]. Volgograd, 1998. 92 p.

22. Shundikov K.V. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya [The mechanism of legal regulation]. Saratov, 2001.
102 p.

23. Radutnaya N.V. Pokushenie na neprikosnovennost sud`i [Attempt on the inviolability of the judge]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya – The Russian Justice, 2001, no. 12, pp. 11-12.