Author

Pautova T.A., Verkhoturova S.V.

Title of article

ISSUESOFLEGALREGULATIONOFTHEORDERSOFINVESTIGATORANDINQUIRY OFFICER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Section

Section 7. Criminalрrocedural review

Issue, year

2 (44) 2018

Abstract

The effectiveness of ensuring the security of citizens, protecting their rights from criminal encroachments is largely determined by the coordinated activities of law enforcement agencies (in particular, the bodies of preliminary investigation and inquiry) during the initiation and investigation of criminal cases. At the same time, the analysis of the organization of activities for the prevention, detection, investigation of crimes and search for the persons who committed them indicates the
insufficient interaction between investigators, inquiry officers of law enforcement bodies with the inquiring authorities, as well as the lack of a comprehensive approach to solving the problems of
protecting the interests of the state, the rights and freedoms of citizens.various aspects of interaction between the investigator, inquiry officer and the inquiring authorities are considered in the works of
the scientists dealing with criminal proceedings. however, the issues concerning the individual order and its procedural form, are not investigated. The article is devoted to the written order of the investigator, inquiry officer to the inquiring body as the main procedural form of interaction. The role of the institution of a written order of the investigator (inquiry officer) within the pre-trial stages of criminal
proceedings is noted. The author’s definition of the concept of the investigator’s (inquiry officer’s)order is proposed. The problems of the legal regulation of this institution in criminal proceedings at the
present stage are considered, the proposals for improving the norms of criminal procedure legislation are formulated.

Keywords

investigator; inquiry officer; inquiring authority; investigator’s order; inquiry officer’s order; criminal proceedings; interaction.

References

1. Prichiny i sledstvie. Interv’yu Predsedatelya SK RF Bastrykina A.I. [Causes and consequences. Interview of the Chairman of the Investigation Committee of the Russian Federation Bastrykin A.I.]. Rossiyskaya gazeta – Russian newspaper. Federal issue. 2018. 14 January.

2. Doklad Bastrykina A.I. na rasshirennom zasedaniikollegii SKR 26 fevralya 2016 g., 27 fevralya 2014 g. [A.I. Bastrykin at an expanded meeting of the board of the Investigative Committee of Russia on February 26, 2016, February 27, 2014]. Available at: http://sledcom.ru/news/item/1019445 (Accessed December 26, 2017).

3. Derbenev A.P. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya i organa doznaniya pri rassledovanii prestupleniy [Interaction of the investigator and the body of inquiry in the investigation of crimes]. Moscow, Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR, 1983.

4. Esina A.S. Nekotorye problemy, voznikayushchie pri ispolnenii otdel’nykh porucheniy sledovatelya [Some problems that arise in the execution of individual orders of the investigator]. Problemypredvaritel’nogosledstvi ya i doznaniya [Problems of preliminary investigation and inquiry]. Moscow, All-Russian Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2003. Pp. 79-86.
5. Plesneva L.P. Vzaimodeystvie sledovateley s organom doznaniya: pravovye i organizatsionnye osnovy [Interaction of investigators with the body of inquiry: legal and organizational bases]. Irkutsk, 2016. 104 p.

6. Kruglikov A.P. Postanovleniya sledovatelya, ispolnyaemye organom doznaniya po ego porucheniyam [Resolutions of the investigator, executed by the body of inquiry on his instructions]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 5, Yurisprudenziya – Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 5: Jurisprudence, 2011, no. 1 (14)б рp. 203-204.