Author

URDA M.N.

Title of article

FICTITIOUS REGISTRATION AND MIGRATION REGISTRATION
IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERSECTORAL COOPERATION

Section

Section 6. Law enforcement policy

Issue, year

2 (48) 2019

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to assess the violations of immigration and registration records for the need for criminalization, to identify the elements differentiating criminal and administrative responsibility that can adequately reflect the public danger of actions (if there are
social and political prerequisites for criminalization) and to formulate the proposals for improving the legislation regarding the restoration of the system-forming links of these offences.Basing on the
results of the study, the author of the article comes to the conclusion that there are no grounds for criminalizing the fictitious registration of a citizen of the Russian Federation at the place of stay or at
the place of residence in the premises in the Russian Federation and equating this offenсe with the fictitious registration of foreign citizens (stateless persons). Offences, different in nature and degree of
public danger, should receive a different legal assessment. Fictitious migration registration creates the conditions for external illegal migration – a new threat to the national security of the state. This is the
social danger of the act. However, the criminalization of the act was not carried out properly, as the principle of economy of repression, as well as technical and legal rules for constructing norms were
violated. The author formulated the proposals for improving the criminal legislation regarding the liability for this crime.

Keywords

illegal migration; migration registration; registration record; intersectoral interaction; criminal liability.

References

1. Pikurov N.I. K voprosu o granitsah sistemy ugolovnogo prava [On the issue of the limits of the criminal law system]. Sistemnost’ v ugolov-nom prave: materialy II Rossiyskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava, sostoyavshegosya 31 maya – 1 iyunya 2007 g. [Sistem in criminal law: materials of the II Russian Congress of Criminal Law, held on May
31 – June 1, 2007]. Moscow, 2007. Pp. 317-322.
2. Filippov P.A. Prestupleniya protiv poryadka upravleniya: zakon, teoriya, praktika [Crimes against order
management: law, theory, practice]. Moscow, Zertsalo M Publ., 2017. 512 p.

3. Bogdan V.V., Urda M.N. Konvergentsiya prava i zakona (na primere realizatsii prav inostrannyh grazhdan na svobodu peredvizheniya i vybor mesta zhitel’stva) [The convergence of law and the law (on the example of the implementation of the rights of foreign citizens to freedom of movement and the choice of place of residence)].
Nauka bez granits – Science without Borders, 2017, no. 9 (14), pp. 55-59.

4. Tihonova S.S. Legal’noe definirovanie kak sposob konkretizatsii ugolovno-pravovyh predpisaniy v Osobennoy chasti sovremennogo kodifitsirovannogo ugolovnogo zakona [Legal definition as a way to specify criminal law regulations in the Special Part of the modern codified criminal law]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo
gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo – News of South-West State University. Series: History and
Law, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 63-70.

5. Tihonova S.S. Innovatsionnye takticheskie yuridiko-tehnicheskie priemy normativnogo strukturirovaniya v ugolovno-pravovoy sfere kak defekty zakonotvorcheskoy deyatel’nosti [Innovative tactical legal-technical methods of regulatory structuring in the criminal law sphere as defects in lawmaking]. Yuridicheskaya tehnika – Legal
technology, 2015, no. 9, pp. 754-758.

6. Yuridicheskaya tehnika [Legal technology]. Moscow, Department of State Service and Personnel of the
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2012. 384 p.