|
Abstract
|
The article examines the concepts related to legal irresponsibility: “legal anomie”, “legal nihilism” and “offence”. The author defines their common and distinctive characteristics in order
to identify the place of legal irresponsibility in the system of the related legal concepts. Various manifestations of legal irresponsibility are considered. The conclusions about its features in comparison
with the characteristics of legal liability as a holistic legal phenomenon, including the positive and negative aspects of implementation, are made. According to the author’s opinion, legal irresponsibility
at the institutional level is the lack or declarative character of the norms of legal responsibility or other imperfection of the legislation, that excludes the possibility of bringing to legal responsibility and its
implementation. Legal irresponsibility at the level of implementation of the rules of law is the state of public relations, characterized by the commission of offences, avoiding the liability by the offender,
the appointment of legal punishment that does not correspond to the nature and degree of social danger of the offence and the personality of the offender. Legal irresponsibility is connected with
such phenomena as an offence, legal nihilism, legal idealism, legal anomie, but is not identical to them. The lack of effective law enforcement can lead to actual legal irresponsibility of the offender. In this regard, it is necessary to distinguish between formal legal liability and actual legal irresponsibility.
|
|
References
|
1. Hachaturov R.L., Lipinskiy D.A. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [General theory of legal liability]. St. Petersburg, Yurid. tsentr Press Publ., 2007. 910 p.
2. Bondarev A.S. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ i bezotvetstvennost’ – storony pravovoy kul’tury i antikul’tury sub”ektov prava [Legal responsibility and irresponsibility are the sides of legal culture and anti-culture of legal entities]. St. Petersburg, Yurid. tsentr Press Publ., 2008. 187 p.
3. Hachaturov R.L. O pravonarushaemosti, yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti i bezotvetstvennosti [On offense,
legal liability and irresponsibility]. Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Novye gumanitarnye
issledovaniya – Bulletin of Orel State University. Series: New Humanitarian Research, 2008, no. 2, pp. 88-89.
4. Markin A.V. Pozitivnaya bezotvetstvennost’ [Positive Irresponsibility]. Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki – Vector Science of Togliatti State University. Series: Jurisprudence, 2010, no. 1, pp. 50-52.
5. Markin A.V. Fatal’naya priroda bezotvetstvennosti [The fatal nature of irresponsibility]. Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki – Vector science of Togliatti State University. Series: Jurisprudence, 2011, no. 1 (4), pp. 80-83.
6. Brinchuk M.M. Bezotvetstvennost’ v sovremennom ekologicheskom prave [Irresponsibility in modern environmental law]. Gosudarstvo i parvo – State and law, 2010, no. 11, pp. 56-66.
7. Borkov V.N. Pravo na bezotvetstvennost’ [The right to irresponsibility]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta.
Seriya: Pravo – Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Right, 2011, no. 1 (26), pp. 220-221.
8. Ryabova V.E. Bezotvetstvennost’ ili neznanie, pravovoy nigilizm ili mentalitet [Irresponsibility or ignorance, legal nihilism or mentality. Ohrana i ekonomika truda – Protection and labor economics, 2013, no. 4, pp. 53-56.
9. Polyakov S.B. Antizakonodatel’stvo kak rezul’tat bezotvetstvennosti sudebnoy vlasti [Anti-law as a result of
the irresponsibility of the judiciary]. Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki – Vector science of Togliatti State University. Series: Jurisprudence, 2017, no. 3, pp. 34-37.
10. Vittenberg E.Ya. Ot sotsial’noy bezotvetstvennosti k sotsial’noy otvetstvennosti [From social irresponsibility to social responsibility]. Rossiya i sovremenniy mir – Russia and the modern world, 2009, no. 1, pp. 85-104.
11. Voronin A.A. Otvetstvennost’ cheloveka i bezotvetstvennost’ tehniki [Responsibility of a person and irresponsibility of technology]. Filosofiya i kul’tura – Philosophy and Culture, 2011, no. 1, pp. 92-100.
12. Markin A.V. Logika yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [The logic of legal liability]. Moscow, Nota Bene Publ.,
2010. 218 p.
13. Feofanov K.A. Sotsial’naya anomiya: obzor podhodov amerikanskoy sotsiologii [Social anomie: a review of the approaches of American sociology]. SOTSIS, 1992, no. 5, pp. 30-41.
14. Kara-Murza S.G. Anomiya v Rossii: prichiny i proyavleniya [Anomie in Russia: causes and manifestations].
Moscow, Nauchniy ekspert Publ., 2013. 264 p.
15. Gerashchenko D.I. Pravovaya anomiya v rossiyskom obshchestve: strukturno-deyatel’nostnoe izmerenie. Kand. Diss. [Legal anomie in Russian society: structural and activity dimension. Cand. Diss.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2011. 148 p.
16. Tolstik V.A. Pravovoy totalitarizm: strategiya pravotvorchestva ili dvizhenie po inertsii [Legal totalitarianism: the strategy of law-making or the inertial movement]. Yuridicheskaya tehnika – Legal Engineering, 2015, no. 9, pp. 760-763.
17. Borozdina M.S. Instituty yuridicheskoy anomii i pravovogo nigilizma v liberal’no-demokraticheskoy modernizatsii rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti [Institutions of legal anomie and legal nihilism in the liberal-democratic modernization of Russian statehood]. Filosofiya prava – Philosophy of Law, 2009, no. 3, pp. 121-124.
18. Nyrkov V.V. Pooshchrenie i nakazanie kak parnye yuridicheskie kategorii [Encouragement and punishment as paired legal categories]. Saratov, 2006. 144 p.
19. Mal’ko A.V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave [Incentives and restrictions in law]. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 2004.
250 p.
20. Matuzov N.I. Pravovoy nigilizm i pravovoy idealizm kak dve storony odnoy medali [Legal nihilism and
legal idealism as two sides of the same coin]. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie – News of higher
educational institutions. Jurisprudence, 1994, no. 2, pp. 40-49.
|
