Author

Rodin V.V., Yadzhin n.V.

Title of article

Pre-trial agreement and plea bargain:  pragmatism without conflict with morality?

Section

Comparative studies and foreign experience

Issue, year

4 (30) 2014

Abstract

A comparative legal analysis of plea bargain in the continental Europe, England and the USA is conducted. The history of the plea bargain emergence in common law is examined, its features are shown. Such agreements to plead guilty are often reached after bringing a charge. The freedom of agreement is guaranteed by the powers of police, court and public prosecutor to decide on the severity of the charge, its change or dismissal (partial or complete). An obvious “conflict of interests” is shown: the economic benefit of plea agreement is complicated by ignoring the public morality principles. It doesn’t allow to use the same form of plea bargain in the Russian realities: the essence of the pre-trial agreement institute doesn’t imply that the defendant pleads guilty, but contributes to solving a crime (disclosure of information about accomplices, compensation for damage). The proposals to improve the regulation of the Russian pre-trial cooperation agreement are made. The foreign models of plea bargain are studied: German, French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. Their comparison allows to conclude that such deal can be used in different national legal systems and in various models of criminal procedure. It’s argued that the institution of pre-trial agreement is the objective response of the Russian law enforcement bodies to modern challenges. American model of plea bargain can be considered optimal despite its shortcomings. Other states don’t accept it unchanged. Russia also has to transform the western model of plea bargain, taking into account the requirements of the domestic legal culture.

Keywords

plea bargain, pre-trial cooperation agreement, admission of guilt, conciliations.

References

1. Kirsanov A.Yu. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve. Analiz, praktika, vyvody [Pre-trial agreement on cooperation. Analysis, and practice, the findings]. Moscow, Yuniti-Dana: Zakon i pravo Publ., 2012. 128 p.

2. Myuller V.K. Novyy anglo-russkiy slovar’ [The New English-Russian dictionary]. Moscow, 1999.

3. Langbein J.H. Compative Criminal Procedure: Germany. St. Paul, 1977.

4. Makhov V.N., Peshkov M.A. Ugolovnyy protsess SShA (dosudebnye stadii) [US criminal trial (pre-trial stage)]. Moscow, 1988. 208 p.

5. Fischer G. Plea Bargaining’s Triumph: A History of Plea Bargaining in America 222-23&tbl.9.1.2003.

6. Alschuler A.W. The Defense Attorney’s Role in Plea Bargaining. Yale Law Journal, 1975, no 84.

7. Moley R. The Vanishing Jury. Southern California Law Review,1926, no 2.

8. Alschuler A. Plea Bargaining and Its History. Law and Society Review, 1979, no 13.

9. U.S. National Commission On Law Observance And Enforcement. Report On Crime And The Foreign Born. Washington. DC. 1931. Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1931.

10. Olin D. Plea Bargain. The New Yourk Times Magazine, 2002, 29 Sept.

11. Report of the President’s Commission on Crime in the District of Columbia. 1966. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

12. Bjerk D. On the Role of Plea Bargaining and the Distribution of Sentences in the Absence of Judicial System Frictions (Preliminary Draft). McMaster University and RAND Corp, 2005, 29 Nov.

13. Interview with Mr. Nunes. Oakland Public Defender, 13 Febr. 1968; Interview with Mr. Arkin. Oakland Public Defender. 11 Jan. 1966; Interview with Mr. Conn. Oakland Public Defender, 12 Jan. 1966.

14. Detlef D. Der strafprozessuale Vergleich. Strafverteidiger, 1982, N 2.

15. Langer M. From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure.  Harvard International Law Journal, 2004, no. 1.

16. Ministere de la Justice. Circulaires de la direction des Affaires criminelles et des Graces. Bulletin Officiel du Ministere de la Justice, 2001, no 83.

17. Topchieva T.V. Sootnoshenie sdelki o priznanii viny (na primere SShA) i poryadka razresheniya ugolovnogo dela, predusmotrennogo glavoy 40 UPK RF [The ratio of a plea bargain (for example, USA) and the settlement of the criminal case under Chapter 40 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Altayskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik – Altai Law Herald, 2013, no. 1 (1), pp. 31-34.