Author

DERYUGAA.N., SHAKLEINS.N.

Titleofarticle

THEPENOLOGICALASPECTOFTHEINSIGNIFICANCE
OFANADMINISTRATIVEOFFENCE

Section

Section 3. Administrative delictology

Issue, year

2 (48) 2019

Abstract

The issues concerning the development of a new field of science – administrative penology, are analyzed in the article. The subject of the study of administrative penology is focusedon the search for increasing the effectiveness of administrative responsibility measures. Basing on the analysis of article 2.9 of the Code of Administrative Responsibility of the Russian Federation and the judicial practice of its application, as well as the scientific community’s opinions, the problems of
understanding the legal institution of the insignificance of the committed administrative offence are revealed, its most important elements are listed and evaluated. It is concluded that the administrative and
tort law needs to be improved in order to eliminate the identified problems. In particular, it is proposedto fix the procedure for the mandatory verification of the decision on recognition of administrative and tort action as insignificant by the prosecutor at the legislative level, which will minimize the corruption component of the decisions on the insignificance of an administrative offence. In this case, the presence
of the criteria proposed in the article should be subject to verification, the combination of these criteria should indicate the insignificance of an administrative offence. According to the authors of the article’s
opinions, introduction of the proposed amendments and additions to the legislation will help to increase the effectiveness of the legal institution of the insignificance of an administrative offence, allow to
avoid the violation of the principle of justice and inevitability of punishment when implementing it, and also reduce corruption risks.

Keywords

administrative offence; administrative punishment; insignificance of the offenсe; administrative penology; administrative delictology.

References

1. KlyushnikovI.A. Sovershenstvovaniezakonodatel’stvaipravoprimenitel’noypraktikiobosvobozhdeniiotadministrativnoyotvetstvennostipomaloznachitel’nostipravonarusheniy. Avtoref. Kand. Diss. [Improvement of legislation and law enforcement practice on exemption from administrative liability for insignificant offenses.
Autoabstract Cand. Diss.]. Lyubertsy, 2013. 24 p.

2. Panov A.B. O maloznachitel’nosti administrativnyh pravonarusheniy [About insignificance of administrative offenses]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki – Pravo. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 2012, no. 2, pp. 68-86.

3. Klyushnikov I.A. K voprosu o vozmozhnyh priznakah (kriteriyah) ob”ektivnoy storony maloznachitel’nogo administrativnogo pravonarusheniya [On the issue of possible signs (criteria) of the objective side of a minor administrative offense]. Sovremennaya nauka: Aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki – Modern Science: Actual
problems of theory and practice, 2012, no. 3, pp. 74-78.
4. Pirogov V.Yu. Kriterii priznaniya administrativnogo pravonarusheniya maloznachitel’nym [Criteria for
the recognition of an administrative offense of minor importance]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Social’no-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya – Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Socioeconomic and legal research, 2013, no. 3, pp. 67-74.